Tanzania Public Procurement Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Latest topics
» HOW TO REGISTER A COMPANY FOR PPRA PROCUREMENTS
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyWed Dec 18, 2019 9:13 pm by yohanaamon@yahoo.com

» Is non-submission of invalid CRB receipt voucher a major deviation?
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyTue Dec 17, 2019 1:00 am by RJM

» MAKANDARASI KUWEKWA NDANI KWA KUTOKAMILISHA MIRADI NDANI YA MUDA
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyTue Dec 17, 2019 12:46 am by RJM

» How Supplier can register in e-Procurement system (TANePS)
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyThu Dec 12, 2019 5:48 am by pms

» Kukosekana risiti ya ununuzi wa tenda
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptySat Apr 27, 2019 6:05 pm by ALLY MUNIR

» IS IT TIME TO THINK OF DEACTIVATING TENDER BOARDS AND INTRODUCE A MECHANISM OF PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL OPINION?
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyThu Apr 11, 2019 3:40 pm by pms

» e-Procurement System is now operational
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyThu Apr 11, 2019 3:14 pm by Admin

» TENDA ZINAPOKOSA WAOMBAJI
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyThu Jan 10, 2019 10:42 pm by thanksme

» Attendance of District Treasurer in Council Tender Board meetings
Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 EmptyMon Mar 19, 2018 8:57 pm by GWK

March 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 1676 registered users
The newest registered user is esagile

Our users have posted a total of 1240 messages in 351 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 2 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 225 on Sun Oct 03, 2021 4:24 pm

Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013

2 posters

Go down

Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 Empty Re: Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013

Post  Magoti.Daniel Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:02 pm

RJM wrote:
Daniel,

I think the contradiction which Mlinga  is referring to emanates from the fact that R112 is under PART II - GENERAL PROVISIONS while R322 is under PART IX - PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANTS (very specific for Consulting Services).

PPR -  R112 (1) (c)  - in the case of employment of consultant, 0.1 up to 0.2 percent of the contract value per day up to a sum equivalent to the amount of the performance guarantee.

PPR-R322, liquidated damages equals to one-tenth of one percent of the cost of unperformed portion for every day of delay and in no case shall the sum of liquidated damages exceed ten percent of the performance security.

Reading the two Regulations, I tend to agree with Mlinga's opinion on the contradiction between the two.

1. PPR - R322 only recognize 0.1 percent (mathematically one-tenth of one percent = 0.1 percent)  but not the range provided under R112 (1) (c); and

2. 0.1 percent of the contract value per day NOT EQUAL to 0.1 percent (one-tenth of percent) of the cost of unperformed portion for every day of delay - although could be equal if portion has been performed by the consultant.

If I was a consultant I will go for item 2 - less penalty than item 1.
..Thanks for the clarification, got you..

Magoti.Daniel

Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-03-21
Age : 38

Back to top Go down

Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 Empty Re: Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013

Post  RJM Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:00 pm

Daniel,

I think the contradiction which Mlinga  is referring to emanates from the fact that R112 is under PART II - GENERAL PROVISIONS while R322 is under PART IX - PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION AND EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANTS (very specific for Consulting Services).

PPR -  R112 (1) (c)  - in the case of employment of consultant, 0.1 up to 0.2 percent of the contract value per day up to a sum equivalent to the amount of the performance guarantee.

PPR-R322, liquidated damages equals to one-tenth of one percent of the cost of unperformed portion for every day of delay and in no case shall the sum of liquidated damages exceed ten percent of the performance security.

Reading the two Regulations, I tend to agree with Mlinga's opinion on the contradiction between the two.

1. PPR - R322 only recognize 0.1 percent (mathematically one-tenth of one percent = 0.1 percent)  but not the range provided under R112 (1) (c); and

2. 0.1 percent of the contract value per day NOT EQUAL to 0.1 percent (one-tenth of one percent) of the cost of unperformed portion for every day of delay - although could be equal if portion has not been performed by the consultant.

If I was a consultant I will go for item 2 - less penalty than item 1.


Last edited by RJM on Thu Mar 20, 2014 3:20 am; edited 1 time in total
RJM
RJM

Posts : 260
Join date : 2009-07-30
Age : 73
Location : What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure

Back to top Go down

Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 Empty Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013

Post  Magoti.Daniel Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:19 pm

Reference is made on Regulation 112 and 322 of Public Procurement Regulation 2013.

According to Dr. Ramadhan S. Mlinga (Lecturer, UDSM) article on basic elements of Public Procurement Act 2011 and Public Procurement Regulations 2013, PART 5 he has noted that " On liquidated damages, there is contradiction of what is provided under PPR-R322 with what is provided under PPR-R112" with respect to imposition of liquidated damages.

that is to say..

PPR-R112, liquidated damages equals to 0.1 to 0.2% of contract value per day up to a sum equivalent to the amount of performance guarantee, while

PPR-R322, liquidated damages equals to one-tenth of one percent of the cost of unperformed portion for every day of delay and in no case shall the sum of liquidated damages exceed ten percent of the performance security.

In so doing Dr. Ramadhan Mlinga concluded that, this contradiction needs to be sorted out"

But on my side after going through these regulations i prefer to differ in one sense by considering that, R-112 is for works, goods and non-consultancy services liquidated damages and the rest R-322 is for consultancy..

Plse with any comment lets share this contradiction.

Magoti.Daniel

Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-03-21
Age : 38

Back to top Go down

Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013 Empty Re: Contradiction in Liquidated damages in Public Procurement Regulation 2013

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum