Tanzania Public Procurement Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Latest topics
» HOW TO REGISTER A COMPANY FOR PPRA PROCUREMENTS
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyWed Dec 18, 2019 9:13 pm by yohanaamon@yahoo.com

» Is non-submission of invalid CRB receipt voucher a major deviation?
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyTue Dec 17, 2019 1:00 am by RJM

» MAKANDARASI KUWEKWA NDANI KWA KUTOKAMILISHA MIRADI NDANI YA MUDA
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyTue Dec 17, 2019 12:46 am by RJM

» How Supplier can register in e-Procurement system (TANePS)
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyThu Dec 12, 2019 5:48 am by pms

» Kukosekana risiti ya ununuzi wa tenda
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptySat Apr 27, 2019 6:05 pm by ALLY MUNIR

» IS IT TIME TO THINK OF DEACTIVATING TENDER BOARDS AND INTRODUCE A MECHANISM OF PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL OPINION?
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyThu Apr 11, 2019 3:40 pm by pms

» e-Procurement System is now operational
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyThu Apr 11, 2019 3:14 pm by Admin

» TENDA ZINAPOKOSA WAOMBAJI
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyThu Jan 10, 2019 10:42 pm by thanksme

» Attendance of District Treasurer in Council Tender Board meetings
INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 EmptyMon Mar 19, 2018 8:57 pm by GWK

May 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 1676 registered users
The newest registered user is esagile

Our users have posted a total of 1240 messages in 351 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 4 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 4 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 225 on Sun Oct 03, 2021 4:24 pm

INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011

2 posters

Go down

INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 Empty INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011

Post  freddy.mbeyella Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:13 pm

Magoti,
Your observation is valid. However, the term “Value for money” (VFM) has many interpretations but, they all mean the same. Generally, VFM is used to describe an explicit commitment to ensuring the best results possible are obtained from the money spent. Value for money is based not only on the minimum purchase price (economy) but it also on the maximum efficiency and effectiveness of the purchase. It concern for more transparency and accountability in spending public funds, and for obtaining the maximum benefit from the resources available.
So VFM can be looked upon as the output/ goal of procurement or constituent of procurement process. That is why in some literature it is described as one of the principles of public procurement or the target of procurement.

freddy.mbeyella

Posts : 74
Join date : 2009-08-25

Back to top Go down

INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011 Empty INCORRECT USE OF VFM IN PPA No. 21 OF 2004 & No. 9 OF 2011

Post  Magoti.Daniel Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:35 pm

Referring to different books, journals, lectures and seminars conducted by PPRA & PSPTB, the word VFM "Value for Money" includes three components namely; "Efficiency, Effectiveness & Economy"

But after going through frequently in S. 58 (2) of PPA No. 21 of 2004 & S. 63 (2) of PPA No. 09 of 2011, the word "Value for Money" has been used independently from the word efficiency, economy and effectiveness.....My concern is, does this VFM in public procurement act means different thing from what is written in different books & journals

Magoti.Daniel

Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-03-21
Age : 38

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum