Latest topics
Statistics
We have 1676 registered usersThe newest registered user is esagile
Our users have posted a total of 1240 messages in 351 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 4 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 4 Guests :: 1 BotNone
Most users ever online was 225 on Sun Oct 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Re: Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
Dear in the Forum,
I can repond on the submission of Magova+fmwalongo,
Do We agree in procurement literature that procurement proceeding=procurement cycle (as Magova said)= user need identification+ payment stage to SP/CONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER ( end of procurement cycle)?.
In connection to this, Can we discuss the essence and role of PPRA AND PPAA on the subject matter submitted against the provision of laws in PPA 2004 and the proposed PPA 2010?. It seemed that, still there are contradictions from the powers of two entities (PPRA & PPAA) and the meaning of procurement proceeding and who can act on the topic submitted.
Secondly, what the law of contract says on contract to be in force and the termination of contract?, is the one entered the contract can terminate (PE) or the third party( court or PPRA, PPAA)?.
I submit for noting and discussion
I can repond on the submission of Magova+fmwalongo,
Do We agree in procurement literature that procurement proceeding=procurement cycle (as Magova said)= user need identification+ payment stage to SP/CONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER ( end of procurement cycle)?.
In connection to this, Can we discuss the essence and role of PPRA AND PPAA on the subject matter submitted against the provision of laws in PPA 2004 and the proposed PPA 2010?. It seemed that, still there are contradictions from the powers of two entities (PPRA & PPAA) and the meaning of procurement proceeding and who can act on the topic submitted.
Secondly, what the law of contract says on contract to be in force and the termination of contract?, is the one entered the contract can terminate (PE) or the third party( court or PPRA, PPAA)?.
I submit for noting and discussion
GadielCM- Posts : 69
Join date : 2009-08-21
Re: Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
In the fist place procurement proceedings does not included contract management. Procurement proceedings to me includes all the events in sourcing a bidder and once a bid is already sourced a contract is signed and what follows there after is contract management which is not procurement proceedings.
The issue of a third party terminating the contract, you see when PPRA or PPA is given power to intervene into procuremnt proceedings or contract management, those power are judicial ie in the nature of court powers. The court does not need to be a party to be able to terminate the contract. When PPRA will be exercising the powers to terminate the contract , if the amendment will be approved, it will be after having made a finding and is satisfied of particular irregularities.
Thanks for now
The issue of a third party terminating the contract, you see when PPRA or PPA is given power to intervene into procuremnt proceedings or contract management, those power are judicial ie in the nature of court powers. The court does not need to be a party to be able to terminate the contract. When PPRA will be exercising the powers to terminate the contract , if the amendment will be approved, it will be after having made a finding and is satisfied of particular irregularities.
Thanks for now
fmwalongo- Posts : 22
Join date : 2010-09-13
Re: Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
From clarifications given by Magova and Maduhu in their posts now I can proceed with my concern.
Does this imply that PPRA has given also a mandate to terminate the contract which has come into force or in the implementation stage?
The same power has been given to Public Procurement Appeal Authority [PPAA] under S82(4)(g) [PPA2004] and S92(4)(g) [Proposed Act 2010] – “order that the procurement proceedings be terminated”. If one analyze the power given to PPRA it appears that it can terminates the contract which has come into force or in the implementation stage [I don’t how because PPRA is not party to the contract] while PPAA has given power to order the termination of contract [I hope the order will be directed to Procuring Entities]. To refresh memories of the forum members the same issue was discussed in this forum under Complaints Reviews [topic – PPAA Rulings] where no consensus was reached whether this power is implementable because PPAA are struggling to enforce this.
This time I am wondering whether PPRA can enforce this power. My main concern is whether third party [not party to the contract] can terminate the contract AND if this is possible which provision of the contract will apply?
Does this imply that PPRA has given also a mandate to terminate the contract which has come into force or in the implementation stage?
The same power has been given to Public Procurement Appeal Authority [PPAA] under S82(4)(g) [PPA2004] and S92(4)(g) [Proposed Act 2010] – “order that the procurement proceedings be terminated”. If one analyze the power given to PPRA it appears that it can terminates the contract which has come into force or in the implementation stage [I don’t how because PPRA is not party to the contract] while PPAA has given power to order the termination of contract [I hope the order will be directed to Procuring Entities]. To refresh memories of the forum members the same issue was discussed in this forum under Complaints Reviews [topic – PPAA Rulings] where no consensus was reached whether this power is implementable because PPAA are struggling to enforce this.
This time I am wondering whether PPRA can enforce this power. My main concern is whether third party [not party to the contract] can terminate the contract AND if this is possible which provision of the contract will apply?
RJM- Posts : 260
Join date : 2009-07-30
Age : 73
Location : What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure
About procurement proceeding
The word proceedings means a series of events. Therefore procurement proceedings is a series of events/actions or activities that are undertaken when engaging in procurement. So to my side procurement proceedings is the same as the procurement process or procurement cycle
Magova- Posts : 1
Join date : 2010-08-26
Re: Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
I think 'Procurement Proceeding' is a big concept that include user needs, Financial status, Relationship building, Environment Conservation, purchasing processes and many mores.
Maduhu- Posts : 21
Join date : 2010-08-02
Amendment of PPA 2004 - Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings
One of the salient features of the Proposed PPA 2010 is more power to PPRAA as per S17(1) (b) [Cancellation of Procurement Proceedings] which states that “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided for in any written law, the Authority shall, after reviewing a complaint or conducting an investigation is reasonably satisfied that there is a breach of this Act, the Regulations or any guideline – terminate the procurement proceedings”. The proposed Act 2010 defines, “procurement proceedings as the proceedings to be followed by a procuring entity or any approving authority when engaging in procurement”.
Prior commenting on the power referred above, I will appreciate if someone lights the sheds whether “procurement proceedings” entails the stages outlined in the definition of procurement process? The Act defines procurement process [i]“as the successive stages in the procurement cycle, including planning, choice of procedures, measure to solicit offers from tenderers, examination and evaluation of those offers, award of contract and contract management”.
Prior commenting on the power referred above, I will appreciate if someone lights the sheds whether “procurement proceedings” entails the stages outlined in the definition of procurement process? The Act defines procurement process [i]“as the successive stages in the procurement cycle, including planning, choice of procedures, measure to solicit offers from tenderers, examination and evaluation of those offers, award of contract and contract management”.
Last edited by RJM on Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:16 am; edited 2 times in total
RJM- Posts : 260
Join date : 2009-07-30
Age : 73
Location : What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure
Similar topics
» Weaknesses of the Public Procurement Act of 2004
» Ammendments to PUblic Procurement Act 2004
» ASSESSMENT OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT 2004 IN EMPOWERING DOMESTIC FIRMS
» PPA 2016 – Amendment of Section 76 – Negotiations of Prices
» Posting of Public Procurement Appeals Authority Rullings in the Tanzania Procurement Journal Supplement
» Ammendments to PUblic Procurement Act 2004
» ASSESSMENT OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT 2004 IN EMPOWERING DOMESTIC FIRMS
» PPA 2016 – Amendment of Section 76 – Negotiations of Prices
» Posting of Public Procurement Appeals Authority Rullings in the Tanzania Procurement Journal Supplement
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:13 pm by yohanaamon@yahoo.com
» Is non-submission of invalid CRB receipt voucher a major deviation?
Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:00 am by RJM
» MAKANDARASI KUWEKWA NDANI KWA KUTOKAMILISHA MIRADI NDANI YA MUDA
Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:46 am by RJM
» How Supplier can register in e-Procurement system (TANePS)
Thu Dec 12, 2019 5:48 am by pms
» Kukosekana risiti ya ununuzi wa tenda
Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:05 pm by ALLY MUNIR
» IS IT TIME TO THINK OF DEACTIVATING TENDER BOARDS AND INTRODUCE A MECHANISM OF PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL OPINION?
Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:40 pm by pms
» e-Procurement System is now operational
Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:14 pm by Admin
» TENDA ZINAPOKOSA WAOMBAJI
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:42 pm by thanksme
» Attendance of District Treasurer in Council Tender Board meetings
Mon Mar 19, 2018 8:57 pm by GWK