Latest topics
Statistics
We have 1676 registered usersThe newest registered user is esagile
Our users have posted a total of 1240 messages in 351 subjects
Who is online?
In total there is 0 user online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests :: 1 BotNone
Most users ever online was 225 on Sun Oct 03, 2021 4:24 pm
Appeal to PPAA against Blacklisting under PPA 2011
Page 1 of 1
Appeal to PPAA against Blacklisting under PPA 2011
Section 62(6) of the PPA 2011 allows tenderer to appeal against blacklisting decision to the PPAA. The typical section reads as follows “A tenderer blacklisted pursuant to this section may appeal against the decision to the Appeals Authority within twenty one (21) days from the date when he became aware or should have become aware of such decision. Going by the referred section, the tenderer can be blacklisted if; fraud or corrupt practices has been established against the tenderer; the tenderer fails to abide with a bid securing declaration; the tenderer breaches a procuring contract; the tenderer makes false representation about his qualifications during tender proceedings; and any other grounds that may be deemed necessary by PPRA.
From my own view, this is very very interesting provision as it tries to broaden the dimension of transparency and fairness in the procurement process which is good as we are all praying for that however sometimes could be very tricky and open a Pandora's box. One thing which I am not sure is whether the reasons for blacklisting as outlined above are appealable or not. This is a big challenge to PPAA and time will tell us how it will deal with this.
On the same note, I am picking up the appealing of blacklisting originating from breach of a procuring contract. As we all know the contract documents do have Dispute Resolution clauses within the framework of the contract which outlines how disputes should be dealt with i.e. amicably settlement, adjudication, arbitration and ultimately court. It may be construed that PPAA will replace these mechanisms of dealing with dispute because blacklisting we are referring here will be result of termination whereby supplier, service provider, contractor or consultant fails to perform his obligation under the contract. I have seen numerous terminations challenged using provisions governing the contract and eventually termination notice declared invalid. For PPAA to review the blacklisting appeal, PPAA has to go through the entire case as an Adjudicator or an Arbitrator does by analyzing merits of the facts presented by each party in the contract before determine the matter. Is this the direction which PPAA want to go?
From my own view, this is very very interesting provision as it tries to broaden the dimension of transparency and fairness in the procurement process which is good as we are all praying for that however sometimes could be very tricky and open a Pandora's box. One thing which I am not sure is whether the reasons for blacklisting as outlined above are appealable or not. This is a big challenge to PPAA and time will tell us how it will deal with this.
On the same note, I am picking up the appealing of blacklisting originating from breach of a procuring contract. As we all know the contract documents do have Dispute Resolution clauses within the framework of the contract which outlines how disputes should be dealt with i.e. amicably settlement, adjudication, arbitration and ultimately court. It may be construed that PPAA will replace these mechanisms of dealing with dispute because blacklisting we are referring here will be result of termination whereby supplier, service provider, contractor or consultant fails to perform his obligation under the contract. I have seen numerous terminations challenged using provisions governing the contract and eventually termination notice declared invalid. For PPAA to review the blacklisting appeal, PPAA has to go through the entire case as an Adjudicator or an Arbitrator does by analyzing merits of the facts presented by each party in the contract before determine the matter. Is this the direction which PPAA want to go?
RJM- Posts : 260
Join date : 2009-07-30
Age : 73
Location : What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure
Similar topics
» PPAA Review the PPRA’s Decision Arising from Blacklisting of Tenderers – PPA 2011
» REGURATIONS FOR PPA NO. 7 OF 2011
» Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011
» PPA 2011 - Professional Liability
» Appeal Case No. 32 of 2015-16 M/s Brothers Contractors vs Mzumbe University - BANK STATEMENT
» REGURATIONS FOR PPA NO. 7 OF 2011
» Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011
» PPA 2011 - Professional Liability
» Appeal Case No. 32 of 2015-16 M/s Brothers Contractors vs Mzumbe University - BANK STATEMENT
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:13 pm by yohanaamon@yahoo.com
» Is non-submission of invalid CRB receipt voucher a major deviation?
Tue Dec 17, 2019 1:00 am by RJM
» MAKANDARASI KUWEKWA NDANI KWA KUTOKAMILISHA MIRADI NDANI YA MUDA
Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:46 am by RJM
» How Supplier can register in e-Procurement system (TANePS)
Thu Dec 12, 2019 5:48 am by pms
» Kukosekana risiti ya ununuzi wa tenda
Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:05 pm by ALLY MUNIR
» IS IT TIME TO THINK OF DEACTIVATING TENDER BOARDS AND INTRODUCE A MECHANISM OF PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONAL OPINION?
Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:40 pm by pms
» e-Procurement System is now operational
Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:14 pm by Admin
» TENDA ZINAPOKOSA WAOMBAJI
Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:42 pm by thanksme
» Attendance of District Treasurer in Council Tender Board meetings
Mon Mar 19, 2018 8:57 pm by GWK